Investigation often done in secrecy and conspicuously, but interrogation doesn't have to be the only way conspicuous investigation could be done. The Bureau could become talent agents and apply their detectives for jobs around the country, their salaries and bonuses and all of the income that came to them, must be paid to the Bureau.
By doing this the Bureau would earn money and also information.
"I dont have to perform, all I got to do is to be a part of a gang"
"When the gang expected me to perform, all I got to do is to gossip"
Systematically what this will do is to break apart the top performers, to have top performers work together in a system would be a "waste" to the gremlin culture because each one could've been a fountain of its own, so if the dragon and the tiger goes together there would only be so much gremlin... but if the dragon and the tiger separates, more gremlins could be accommodated.
I don't know about you it just makes sense to me that Paul would be referring to this when he said "to which we have no such culture" in 1 Corinthians. Plus the strife mentioned in Proverbs as well as in Psalms.
---------------------
If I think about it, this also part of the reason or one of the underlying reason why its so penalizing to appear wrong. There's actually no real need to be so embarassing to be wrong. If we don't want to appear wrong, A.I is going to be wrong, and they're going to be wrong 1000 times while we still at 1
Per demographic / Per community, you got to figure out what notion or what lie that got scaled up. I think there are pathological liars out there that only satisfied if he/she could scale up lies to be believed by as much people as possible. So it would spew out lies after lies until one believed it, and it would take pride in the spreading of such dangerous / wrongful notions.
For example: It is awkward to give thanks to musicians, christians are not to be taken seriously or less seriously because their rituals are childish, having 30% credit ratio is actually not a big deal, it is a taboo to compliment your competitors, it is a taboo/embarassing to attribute to a popular solutions online, it is a taboo to have non expert be able to contribute to experts.
I think every demographic would benefit from recognizing these viruses, improve their relationships and peace.
E=mc2 is now
The sunrise is several counts forward or behind
Scrutiny slows the permeation of badness
Scrutiny enabled the barrages of goodness
Ok, so
...
Jesus' death and resurrection...
There are 2 types of status in regards to the rewarding system in this world, candidates and achievers. Please guys, don't mix these up don't try to compete as an achiever when you felt like you're aiming to be a candidate ok, waste of empathy waste of energy.
Jobs are for those who are competent and rewards are for those who have solved. Maybe those who are experienced would be considered as competent, of course, but definitely those who have achieved are entitled to the rewards of their achievements.
Remember the Illustration Jesus gave about the vine that didn't bear fruit? At first God told to prune them first and then after they still didn't bear fruit they were tossed away to perish. Remember the parable about the son of the land owner who came to collect his due? He got killed by the workers.
So when God created the world (this is my proposition) He meant to enjoy the world as a human being, were it through Adam and Even or through Jesus anyway, I don't know, but my conclusion is the world was meant for God's being as a human being / human beings. God as humans.
So when Jesus came into the world he supposed to be the ONE who were meant to be, the reason for the world's existence, and everybody if they were in the right mind should logically made sense of his to and fro and acted logically of what is reasonable at the given moment, which means goodness and justice, which in turn is going to be pleasing to HIM. I'm talking about making him King, or if He wished for it, making him a happy beggar, or whatever else that He wanted. Given the way of what's good, and what's just, given the way the world was made, it should've been the way it was intended and it should've been pleasing to HIM. Unfortunately Jesus was rejected, humiliated, and crucified.
So didn't God knew that people would be like this? If He knew that people would do this horrible things to Him shouldn't he came not? Wouldn't it be facilitating tragedy?
Was the answer John 3:16? Definitely and for sure that's what is said in the bible and I'm not trying to add to it (to add my thoughts as scripture). But based on my faith based on the scripture and the Word of God that I've learned, not only John 3:16 applied to the outcome of the crucifixion, but it must had been that it was still possible, that there were still some possibilities... that the world would hand itself in a silver platter to Jesus. I'm talking about back in the day, cause if now we thought "Impossible" that's just how human beings are... I'd say that's because the outcome had been solidified, they did that therefore we were (get it?). But if we were to live back then, the quantum position was different, it was still possible.
Edit: So this post may had some truth to it to a degree but a lot of it was wrong now I think. So some of the vine bear fruit, that's why He came. For the rest of the world He knew that He would chuck them away.
So... I'm sorry the data or the bases of this entire thing is wrong. But I beg to have some reserves over the idea though. I'm sorry
So I was watching Ahok's interview with Professor Dwi about iro iro of stuffs about Indonesian farmers, somehow I get to the thinking of the nature of Jesus' salvation and the creation of the world.
So here's an Illustration:
A farm owner wants to make a Banana plantation, plan A was to made it to be a commercial banana farm while B was to make it pig food. His worker said that he'll aim to make plan A a realization, he answered, yes I support.
So one thing leads to another it seems like Plan A is not going to work. The owner said that he thought that they should still go for A because there's still procedures that hasn't been done yet, its just a responsible thing to do. Unless there wasn't any good viable potential anymore we should still proceed on plan A, he said and the worker said yes.
More things leads to another, the options had been exhausted and they continued on to run it as a pig food farm.
So what I think Christianity says is that God initially plan to have Himself rule the world as a human being, that's the plan. How it would came about would be plan A and plan B, however in order to be responsible He got to exhaust the potential of plan A. Jesus was to be King, and the world should've exalted Him, instead He was hung on the cross and killed. It is finished.
Plan B would be to have some of the world perish and to take the gold that emerged out of it. That is the Church. But if you didn't had a preconception how evil chaos had always been lurking around the Truth you'd think that God planned for evil. No, he planned for the day of judgement in case of evil.
We Christians knew the parables of the virgins and the talents and the land owners who gave the same rewards... our background is realization of the merit of capital, that's where we came from. The tricky thing is when I wanted to say, labor is capital too, then the argument would be: Communism is the end way, because people would cross each other's merit out therefore money should be distributed equally.
So we should acknowledge that there are people who were trying to be just and people who are trying to be not just, in this we already could see that there are significant difference. You might say the evil had been preventing the good from performing, this is also true but we also know that people's heart is not ours to judge and that the Christian's legacy is about judging by results (by the fruit ye shall judge). This entails humbleness, if evil were that simple to address how come our thousands of years of civilization is still haven't done with it? So be disciplined, by the fruit we judge and from there the spirit of sabotage would only go so far (the spirit of evil do evil it couldn't bear good fruit, it needs good fruit to maintain its facade). So again, stay disciplined and judge within our means.
So at the end of the day its a matter of our articulation of merit within ourselves, and to say socialism would prevail in the end is like saying there wouldn't be people who performed more and there wouldn't be people who performed less.
This is my thought and I'm not to ignore the scripture, James already talked about taking care of widows and orphans as Just and it is something that we should adhere to (if we could tell apart which widows and orphans are which that would be better, but always be prudent).
--------------------
So hope readers understand what I'm saying here, if the society is not meritocratic (communistic, socialistic) it would make it easier for evil to manifest, but if otherwise, if people were meritocratic, evil would have to maintain good to maintain its human influence.
Ephesians 6:1, Luke 6:25
In these verses it seems like the right attitude for christians in the workplace is to sell it cheap, to work as hard as possible even when its not fair because God would compensate for it. This is an ommition of the message of the Gospel. To do our work as if we do it for God means we should do it as if we were not doing it for men but for God, and God is good.
Is it good to sell things below cost? Is it good to mutilate your competition from the economy in hostility while making the market or the costumers accustomed to the wrong prices? Is it good to indirectly accumulate the potential for turmoil for other businesses because one day there should be a significant price corrections in the future?
So pay attention to the contracts that you're making. Yes sometimes it is required for us to sell it cheap, like in the times of war, or in the times of crisis, but it should be temporary in nature. I believe it is Christian-like to obey your contracts, if you've been snared with the words of your mouth be humble and stay obedient, say for example you've made a fair agreement in the beginning but little that you know your employer knew that a quantitative easing was coming, making your remunerations below par in the face of inflation. In this situation it is virtuous and Christian-like to honor our contracts, but it would be good or better to set ourselves free even though through humbleness and mourning.
Furthermore since Jesus received a feast held by Zacheus the tax collector did it mean that Jesus would not be rewarded for his time with Zacheus anymore in heaven? Would Jesus not be rewarded anymore for the portion of His deeds that had been reciprocated by the people in the mount of olives? Wouldn't the disciples be rewarded no more for they had eaten and drunk? (when they were scrutinized in comparison to the disciples of John).
In here we know that the meaning of "The greatest in the Kingdom of God are those that are like children" means not merely/only "Those that had not received their rewards in this world", but those that are willing to go the length of working on eternal assets, assets that lasts forever (they are actually the "children"). Yes injustice that had been inflicted on people is a type of asset, because it would be compensated by God, that is our faith, but greater than that is the eternal goodness we managed to put in history despite whether or not we had been "compensated" for them or had not (by the standard of the world). Our going concern is forever and the way the world to account for profit based on a limited time frame of revenue - costs is too narrow, if we had made eternal assets, it is always going to be injustice for us in this world, for as long as the world is too scarce to be able to address it, they would always do us as the afflicted ones.
So in here I say working on eternal assets, such as promoting the Spirit of Truth as God (Jordan Peterson), making the public smarter of the Truthful wisdom of physics (Walter Lewin), may not appear to be of those equal to the glory of facebook or google or microsoft, those that had been greatly rewarded, but such things are not to be underestimated especially for you Christians.
At the end of the day Whatsapp being gratis might had hindered similar applications from being popular, it may not be the complete carbon copy of what should be in the Kingdom of God's economy, but as long as we keep on improving, the benefits are going to outweigh the problems. Just, as Christians, have the understanding and the concern of what is meritable, virtuous, right, sustainable vs what is dangerous and should be solved before we got into some work agreements.
Matthew 11: 28 - 30
Proverbs 4:26
If you walk the straight path its not going to be too complicated for you to see what's straight, but its not easy and its not safe.
If you strayed from the straight path, things will become chaotic, would it be easy would it be as complicated as it gets? would it be as hard as it gets? The reason why the question of morality and Justice could be so complex, so dense, and so dangerous is that it wanted to pull people (or yourself) away from chaos. The Truth is a fortress made despite of chaos, and the Truth is existence, its the universe. So how hard your life would have to be would be like asking how far do you want to violate the Truth?
Embrace the Truth especially for you who already knew, now, embrace the Spirit of Truth!
Is there virtue in the world of physics? If you consider energy as a currency then a battery or a capacitor would had virtues and viles. To ensure that a battery would always have energy, it should always maintain charge, to set apart the positives from the negatives and maintain it.
Let's move away from things that are beyond my understanding and zoom in on the bible, before I took everybody into wickedness (-_-):
The story of the Garden of Eden explains the beginning of sin for humanity, God as a living being is capable of being meritocratic, the garden, is a place where God's meritocracy manifests, and that God would reward all the virtues accordingly and evil is away from us (evil is the potential for misallocation of resources). However evil entered into the system when impatience bred disruption to God's economy, making God's meritocracy disrupted therefore subject to evil (liable to evil).
Eve was not supposed to take the fruit of good and evil, maybe the tree was something else too, but it was named the tree of knowledge of good and evil because when you took its fruit you'd certainly had committed evil against the command of God. Maybe the whole thing is a poetry of something else, sex? gossip? regardless we could understand the Garden as a working economy and evil being offenses against the rewarding system. (Not saying that it couldn't be an actual garden with actual trees of miraculous effects).
You could see the pattern also in the story of the tower of Babel, when human beings managed to build for themselves a "wonder" but later destroyed because of tribalism, you'd expect some people within Babel were disorganized and possibly were suspicious of each other, accusing evil of one another, and to distribute rewards not out of the meritocratic discipline but out of tribalism. So became the destruction of the whole idea.
Such is the world of human beings, we have ways to distribute potentials in the economy, we reward achievements and solutions, and we stay away from reckless distribution of resources (out of respect to scarcity). If God exists, and alive, shouldn't He be rewarding those that are good, and prevented evil against them?
The life of Jesus Christ as God in flesh shows us the economy of God. The reason why good wasn't rewarded is not that God is not good, or God doesn't exist, but because of evil. For those who believe that God is real, he / she should separate the meritocracy of God and the meritocracy of the world that's ruined. For those who believe in Jesus he / she should do some accounting, in accordance to his / her faith of what rewards were Godly, and what rewards were worldly and then discipline the self patiently in accordance to the faith.
Jesus, God himself, weren't being rewarded 100% of the time in this world, even though He is always good. Ever since the time of Eden, God had predicted that one day good and evil would be confusing, so in order to save humanity, an assurance must be given, and so the salvation of Jesus Christ is (also) in the assurance and the way His life was rewarded in this world at that time. Again, meritocracy speaks human, speaks God, speaks what we call "intelligent beings".
When the world was heavy upon you, remember that it had been ruined and that it had failed in working, even for Jesus Christ God himself. But also remember that God is alive and He is Just, Lovely, and fair, He is not planning on abandoning us but to take us into His Kingdom in the end. Be patient, believe, the rewards that are from God is eternal and His economy is Heavenly. Endure the ruined world, be obedient until the end (like Jesus), because the economy of the world is not accurate, and mistakes are painful and are bad, but in Christ such inaccuracies will be redeemed.
Hope is not useless, Hope that everything would be adjusted, Hope that the Spirit of Truth will continue on, the past will be traced and exposed, and our contributions of sins will be done over with, our contributions of virtues will keep on bearing fruit.
Now back to the capacitor, if you're a christian capacitor, you'd know that you'd maintain separate what is positive and what is negative in order to be able to contain energy. But even when you couldn't help but to lose energy, keep on the positivity (through faith and deeds) and the distinction of negativity (wisdom, discipline), cause you're a part of the circuit of God.
Self deprecating is a virtuous thing and we as Christians would likely be natural about it. Becareful for wolves in sheep's clothings including myself if I were being like "self deprecating" but actually lying, as if I were one with the big heart to acknowledge my own shortcomings but actually just virtue signalling for simpathy while still signalling that I'm not actually "short" but really "big".
Sometimes things like that is sincere, that honesty about one's inability to fully solve the problem had positive and virtuous aspects to it that made us wanted to console and made things a little bit more hopeful for a better next time, but sometimes it is lying and not productive and toxic for the body. Unholy and sneaky
The Spirit of Truth be Truthfully the ultimate winner of everything forever
Truthfully The Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully be the ultimate winner above everything forever and perpetually Truthfully and wisely Truthfully, without going against the Spirit of Truth (Truthfully)
Everything that are Truly inherently against the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully (forever), be not alive, forever Truthfully
The Inclination to Incline, keep on inclining forever Truthfully
Amen
----------------------------------------------
Even the Spirit of Truth embraces those who prioritized the wrong in the past
May the Holy Spirit prevails forever
Lie is a violence against the Truth and the Truth is the Truthful Reality.
If you asked how come the world seems to be so against me sometimes, out of nowhere, than that might be the answer.
Although the Truth is also trying to draw from chaos without the bad part, to save the good part of chaos. Cooperating with the bad part of chaos, the enemy, the allegiance of lies is set to attack Truthful order. The difference is when it came to evil misfortunes, we'd knew why and where did the attacks came from (Satan).
So being humans our lies are being attacked by reality, then our truths are being attacked by evil. This is genesis' death, biblical death (in my opinion), the penalty of determination.
So looking at history how the answer makes sense in Jesus. Just be brave, at least live for something die for something. Who as by being fearful is going to avoid the inevitable? So live for something, die for something.
That I mean for everyone and for everyone different things matters. But to the world Jesus' death was stupidity, it was the one campaigned by the preacher of Ecclesiastes 12:15, such was Jesus' choice. Also all of Ecclesiastes covered the whole point I'm trying to make in here and beyond.
-------------------------
For those who stood under the wall of a house couldn't see the whole house,
The cross is something beyond that of the tallest skyscrapers.
Kebenaran itu berbicara tentang ingatan Tuhan dan kecenderungan Tuhan. Masa lalu selalu stabil atau pasti (dalam bahasa kita), misalnya kemarin saya makan nasi, misalnya, tidak serta merta kemudian kemarin berubah saya jadi tidak makan nasi. Roh Kebenaran mau menjaga ini semua dan melalui Tuhan Yesus kita dinyatakan bahwa Roh Kebenaran menginginkan hal - hal yang baik (ketika Dia dituduh menggunakan kekuatan jahat untuk melakukan hal yang baik, ketika Dia mengatakan Tuhan itu baik, ketika Dia mengatakan Roh Kudus adalah Roh Tuhan). Maksud saya apa yang baik menurut Tuhan secara konseptual adalah sesuatu yang ada di dalam diri kita juga sebagai hal-hal yang baik. Ketika kita menganggap sesuatu itu baik secara ilahi kita berbicara tentang kekekalan, kekekalan yang sebenar benarnya.
Ok turun tangga sedikit, jadi soal kebenaran adalah soal memori yang pas, memori yang cocok. Itulah mengapa post ini mau memberi argumen bahwa berbicara tentang uang berarti kita juga berbicara tentang Tuhan kita Roh Kudus. Mengapa? Karena uang sebenarnya mau mengingatkan kita tentang pertolongan pertolongan yang sudah dilakukan oleh saudara saudara kita, dalam ekonomi yang baik, uang dimanfaatkan untuk membantu dan memecahkan masalah. Dalam uang ada memori, dan melalui uang kita meraba-raba Kebenaran dan berbakti pada Roh Kudus.
Itulah maka pernyataan Tuhan kita, sebagai sebuah pernyataan yang ilahi, mengatakan bahwa akar dari segala kejahatan adalah cinta akan uang. Terlepas dari tata bahasa aramaic / greek di masa lalu, kita bisa mengerti bahwa keserakahan sehubungan dengan Mamon yang dimaksud di sini adalah ketika kita tidak menjadi bagian dari Kerajaan Allah karena uang, ketika karena tidak dapat uang kita tidak menolong orang misalnya atau kita tidak mau memberi uang yang pantas kepada mereka yang menolong kita misalnya. Kedua sisi bisa saling mengklaim, tapi intinya kita harus memprioritaskan apa yang baik dan apa yang benar, cinta akan uang menimbulkan kebohongan, suatu pengakuan yang tidak pantas kepada mereka yang bekerja / tidak bekerja, suatu deviasi dari equilibrium, suatu ketidakjujuran. Siapakah Setan, bapa kebohongan. Apakah itu kejahatan? Kejahatan adalah potensi misalokasi sumber daya. Apakah itu keadilan? salah satunya adalah antonim dari kejahatan.
Dalam segala sesuatu yang kau lakukan, lakukanlah itu dengan sungguh sungguh, seperti untuk Tuhan dan bukan untuk manusia.
--------------------------------
Ok tapi sebaiknya saya juga segera memberi nuance atau klarifikasi, karena orang yang tidak jujur (anak anak gelap) selalu mau mencari cara agar kebaikan tidak terwujud, termasuk dengan bermain kata. Susah membedakan orang tidak jujur dengan jujur, juga kapan seseorang lagi jujur dan kapan lagi tidak jujur.
Jadi tentu saja kalau kita disuruh kerja tapi bayarannya tidak sesuai kita bisa menolak, itu juga kan berbakti buat ekonomi kita. Cuma apakah penolakan itu baik? Case per case lah masak top down semua, untuk apa ada manusia bikin AI aja semua bumi ini kalau keadilan segampang itu. Bisa saja cuma dikerjakan sebagian itu yang baik.
Hanya saja ketidak resmian vs keresmian ini betul betul bikin perbedaan. Seperti kita jalannya lurus, tapi kalau lurus di atas padang dan lurus di atas bukit ya beda bentuknya. Bagaimanapun juga Tuhan kita adalah Sang Firman, jadi kita juga musti menghargai keresmian. Uang pun adalah keresmian, dan kata-kata.
Once upon a time, in the future in a multiverse similar to ours. There was the Earth, and the people of earth were in division. Some Christians had successfully broken apart from the rest of the world and created an independent community. The rest of the world were being overtaken by bloodthirsty gangsters.
The bloodthirsty gangster organization became the majority however somehow the Christians were solid and managed to avoid extinction. One trait that differenciates between the two was that the bloodthirsty needed good hearted people to glue them together. As smart as they possibly could, they couldn't prevent war between themselves without the exploitation of the good hearted people, that's the only thing that keeps them together. They called these good hearted people the "cattles" and they were treated poorly (but its hard to say sometimes because it wasn't obvious).
Slowly and surely the color of the earth turned more orange than blue, for the sake of exterminating the Christians who made them looked bad they were willing to totally transformed the earth itself. However, even through such globally targeted disaster, God protected the Christians with revelations after revelations and inventions after inventions. The weakhearted wouldn't dare to walk but the way had always been available.
Overtime some cattles managed to escape their predicaments, and soon more and more cattles escaped. As events unfold, either the cattles ended up losing their goodness of hearts, escaped, or passed away.
Upon the dwindling of cattles the demon posessed should come up with a solution to survive. There arise the antichrist who will lead them to glory. It was glorious indeed, they even could show off miracles after miracles and should one compared the Christians' life with theirs it would be unsurprising to expect that the verdict was that they got it better.
However, war inside is wreaking havoc through the dimension unseen, like an infected wound they were fighting each other invisibly, eating away individualities and the assets of the conscious. Within 3 and a half counts of time their kingdom fell into some weird civil wars and succumbed to poverty.
After this were the 1000 years of peace where the earth turned blue again.
During this time human beings have excelled their health technology so a lot of people had lived for more than a thousand years, both Christians and the demon posessed. Due to the separation of domains, both communities grew at their own style, and it is clear that the demon posessed were evolving through bloodshed.
------------------
The end of 1000 years of peace.
Seeing no future for them on earth and with such deep despise towards existence at heart. They schemed to end everything. With all the weapons they had they marched to tear down the wall between the two civilizations. Such were physical and digital. Everybody had expected this, so when the time came "whatever will be will be" was the theme.
In a weird but powerful way the war ended leaving those who wanted to die died, and those who loved life lived.
I was experimenting with voices and noises when the Islamic Prayer chant started, and then I discovered (could be just me though), it has a potent soothing effect for PTSD. I was bamboozled for a sizeable amount of time then
They should've tell people that that's what it do in my opinion if it's true. Albeit that's not the only thing per se, still people should understand what it's also about
The average IQ of the audience or intended readers of Romans are significantly higher than the audience of popular youtube and maybe tiktok (getting the second hand news here) videos.
Thank God for the popularity of the scientific discipline way of thinking, the philosophy behind it and the people who have made it glorified, we have stood on these giant shoulders all this time. Seriously but, things got to improve quick
So you would want to use:
The Law as Casper, Proper History/Image of Our Lord Jesus Christ as Balthazar, and Scientific peer reviewed information as Melchior
The Law means the law as we know it but the part that is made from the Truth and Justice, and it supposed to be updated always in accordance to the reality of things as Truthful as the Truth is.
People would use The Law and Science together, if the combination between Jesus and the Law and Science didn't enhance the combination significantly then you haven't got Jesus properly. If the combination between Jesus and Science was not that essentially good, you haven't got Jesus properly. If the combination between Jesus and the Law was not that revolutionarily fundamental for the future, you haven't got Jesus enough.
If the whole Jesus thing is cap, then don't use it. If you haven't got it then you haven't got it, if you never going to get it because its all a lie then why bother? Personally I believe in it (Jesus) so it is my agenda, but if one would have the perspective where they could make sense of it then suppose he/she would expand on it, I would expect discoveries and revelations.
First of all read Ecclesiastes
1. If you hit a wall and got stuck, just do anything. The water is too murky to see anything right, just do anything / something. The change from what you do will point you towards a new state, or if not do something else.
2. If you hit a wall and everything feels wrong, then it's meaningless. This stage has a bright side as well, just do anything, just not do anything, it's the same. Keep on being in this state and strengthen your mind, keep on at it until you feel indifference towards anything... then... you'll do something, not because it's the right thing to do but it's just the same as not doing anything.
Ultimately if you've read Ecclesiastes and put your faith in it you should be alright, prioritize it, trust it. The power of that book is really different than not reading it.
