Interaction List v.03

Clashes in societies are all about which problem should be prioritized... which solutions must be kept, which should be changed, and which are going to be eliminated.
My say on this is to prioritize love, that's the tendency to keep on experiencing interactions forever.

In order to achieve this, ideally, people should be able to list, interactions that they are the elements:
Example:
-Everybody could rule, intuitively, being able to rule gives you access to rule out dangers or potentials to non lovely interactions.
-Everybody could have intercourse, intuitively, being able to have sex gives you access to sensations that makes you want to keep on experiencing interactions forever.
-Everybody could kill, intuitively, being able to kill gives you access to avoid interactions that are not lovely, when it suddenly appeared before your eyes (self defense).
-Everybody could think,
-Everybody could balance on ropes
-Everybody could shake hands
-etc

Ofcourse there's a lot branches of other purposes or uses of each interactions.

Now, if you could list all of the interactions that people want to perform, you could prioritize, which interactions are relevant at the time compared against their alternatives. Some people like to destroy stuff, me too, video games can be lovely.

My Premarital Agreement consideration

Ok, so maybe I'd like this idea on premarital agreements:

Money brought in by the husband: Wife got 40%, Husband got 60%
Money brought in by the wife: Wife got 60%, Husband got 40%

Organizational entropy v.02

In my opinion, the reason why organism, and organizations got old... is because they make more and more elements in their system... but experienced scarcity of solutions in terms of defining them as unities with each other.

To rejuvinate an organization... there are three principals that I could define so far...

Imagine individual letters a division or department within an organization, the principals are:
1. Separation, illustration: before, "goteambeproductive" after, "go team be productive"
2. Addition of administration, illustration: before: "wttb poucte" .... after "I want to be productive"
3. Reduction of administration, illustration: before: "adfadfIadf'm proadsfdadfaucaadfdftfdsaive" after " I'm productive"

Ofcourse the administrations need to support love, the tendency to keep on experiencing interactions after interactions forever.

More intuitive entropy for me.

So I watched a video on youtube, and wonder... why do high informational entropy was falksdjflakjfas;fkja but aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa is considered as low entropy.

It would be more intuitive to say that as;dlfjadlfjadlfjaf is high entropy, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa is high entropy, "a" is low entropy, "air, cool, time" are low entropies, and "the air is cool" is low entropy.

So the target is to manage as much information as possible to become as low entropy as possible, because according to me, high entropy is the state where elements are not supportive of each other... and low entropy is the state where elements support each other so that they could be considered as a unity.

My take on Jer: 1 ver 5

God doesn't created us out of accident. He has determined a place for us in life, a position in the universe. We all have our own territories of care, by staying in the territory we would realize our potentials. The problem is, bad people knew about this, and they want to make people care about stuff they don't supposed to care. Bad people would then took away from people, their role in the universe.

For example: if there's a kid good to be an astronaut, bad people identified this and thought to themselves, God has created a support system for this kid... if the kid looked the other way... I might be able to snatch some of them resources and made them mine.

These bad people had abandoned their own territory of care, and chose the path of lies.

Be careful, this time the time of onslaught of information, we must know our place, we must know what to care, stay in the law, seek for God's wisdom, and nurture what God had given to us. Small matters matters.

A joke

Here's a joke:

Kalo orang Jawa suka manis
Orang Manado suka pedes
Orang bule suka?...

Asem... (awesome)

What is funny? v.04

Check out this site:

http://keithdevens.com/quotes

He is a programmer with interesting minds and products. Now reading David Mamet's quote in the page, i noticed that it's funny when your mind work on something. So what comedians do is to present problems for the minds... problems that solutions are apparently plenty or obvious. But the problem must be considered as real by the mind's reflex. 

So I got it backwards, you'd laugh when there's a solution that completely obliterates the problem in your mind. So if the comedian could make your mind register their solutions as the complete solution, even just for a moment... you'd laugh.

I need to say as well that during sessions of discussion about problems... our mind register not only the presented problem as problem, but also how to end the discussion without causing further problems. That kept us observant, serious, and not farting.
-------------