Gremlin Mentality v.02

"I dont have to perform, all I got to do is to be a part of a gang"

"When the gang expected me to perform, all I got to do is to gossip"

Systematically what this will do is to break apart the top performers, to have top performers work together in a system would be a "waste" to the gremlin culture because each one could've been a fountain of its own, so if the dragon and the tiger goes together there would only be so much gremlin... but if the dragon and the tiger separates, more gremlins could be accommodated.

I don't know about you it just makes sense to me that Paul would be referring to this when he said "to which we have no such culture" in 1 Corinthians. Plus the strife mentioned in Proverbs as well as in Psalms. 

---------------------

If I think about it, this also part of the reason or one of the underlying reason why its so penalizing to appear wrong. There's actually no real need to be so embarassing to be wrong. If we don't want to appear wrong, A.I is going to be wrong, and they're going to be wrong 1000 times while we still at 1

We got to measure the lie

 Per demographic / Per community, you got to figure out what notion or what lie that got scaled up. I think there are pathological liars out there that only satisfied if he/she could scale up lies to be believed by as much people as possible. So it would spew out lies after lies until one believed it, and it would take pride in the spreading of such dangerous / wrongful notions. 

For example: It is awkward to give thanks to musicians, christians are not to be taken seriously or less seriously because their rituals are childish, having 30% credit ratio is actually not a big deal, it is a taboo to compliment your competitors, it is a taboo/embarassing to attribute to a popular solutions online, it is a taboo to have non expert be able to contribute to experts. 

I think every demographic would benefit from recognizing these viruses, improve their relationships and peace.

Jesus is coming soon v.02

E=mc2 is now

The sunrise is several counts forward or behind

Scrutiny slows the permeation of badness

Scrutiny enabled the barrages of goodness

Ok, so

...

Jesus' death and resurrection...

Have some taste v.02

There are 2 types of status in regards to the rewarding system in this world, candidates and achievers. Please guys, don't mix these up don't try to compete as an achiever when you felt like you're aiming to be a candidate ok, waste of empathy waste of energy. 

Jobs are for those who are competent and rewards are for those who have solved. Maybe those who are experienced would be considered as competent, of course, but definitely those who have achieved are entitled to the rewards of their achievements.

Quantum super position of people's historical attitude v.02 (correction)

Remember the Illustration Jesus gave about the vine that didn't bear fruit? At first God told to prune them first and then after they still didn't bear fruit they were tossed away to perish. Remember the parable about the son of the land owner who came to collect his due? He got killed by the workers. 

So when God created the world (this is my proposition) He meant to enjoy the world as a human being, were it through Adam and Even or through Jesus anyway, I don't know, but my conclusion is the world was meant for God's being as a human being / human beings. God as humans. 

So when Jesus came into the world he supposed to be the ONE who were meant to be, the reason for the world's existence, and everybody if they were in the right mind should logically made sense of his to and fro and acted logically of what is reasonable at the given moment, which means goodness and justice, which in turn is going to be pleasing to HIM. I'm talking about making him King, or if He wished for it, making him a happy beggar, or whatever else that He wanted. Given the way of what's good, and what's just, given the way the world was made, it should've been the way it was intended and it should've been pleasing to HIM. Unfortunately Jesus was rejected, humiliated, and crucified. 

So didn't God knew that people would be like this? If He knew that people would do this horrible things to Him shouldn't he came not? Wouldn't it be facilitating tragedy?

Was the answer John 3:16? Definitely and for sure that's what is said in the bible and I'm not trying to add to it (to add my thoughts as scripture). But based on my faith based on the scripture and the Word of God that I've learned, not only John 3:16 applied to the outcome of the crucifixion, but it must had been that it was still possible, that there were still some possibilities... that the world would hand itself in a silver platter to Jesus. I'm talking about back in the day, cause if now we thought "Impossible" that's just how human beings are... I'd say that's because the outcome had been solidified, they did that therefore we were (get it?). But if we were to live back then, the quantum position was different, it was still possible.

Edit: So this post may had some truth to it to a degree but a lot of it was wrong now I think. So some of the vine bear fruit, that's why He came. For the rest of the world He knew that He would chuck them away.

So... I'm sorry the data or the bases of this entire thing is wrong. But I beg to have some reserves over the idea though. I'm sorry

Banana farm v.02

So I was watching Ahok's interview with Professor Dwi about iro iro of stuffs about Indonesian farmers, somehow I get to the thinking of the nature of Jesus' salvation and the creation of the world. 

So here's an Illustration: 

A farm owner wants to make a Banana plantation, plan A was to made it to be a commercial banana farm while B was to make it pig food. His worker said that he'll aim to make plan A a realization, he answered, yes I support. 

So one thing leads to another it seems like Plan A is not going to work. The owner said that he thought that they should still go for A because there's still procedures that hasn't been done yet, its just a responsible thing to do. Unless there wasn't any good viable potential anymore we should still proceed on plan A, he said and the worker said yes. 

More things leads to another, the options had been exhausted and they continued on to run it as a pig food farm. 

So what I think Christianity says is that God initially plan to have Himself rule the world as a human being, that's the plan. How it would came about would be plan A and plan B, however in order to be responsible He got to exhaust the potential of plan A. Jesus was to be King, and the world should've exalted Him, instead He was hung on the cross and killed. It is finished. 

Plan B would be to have some of the world perish and to take the gold that emerged out of it. That is the Church. But if you didn't had a preconception how evil chaos had always been lurking around the Truth you'd think that God planned for evil. No, he planned for the day of judgement in case of evil.

Is sosialism objective? v.04

We Christians knew the parables of the virgins and the talents and the land owners who gave the same rewards... our background is realization of the merit of capital, that's where we came from. The tricky thing is when I wanted to say, labor is capital too, then the argument would be: Communism is the end way, because people would cross each other's merit out therefore money should be distributed equally. 

So we should acknowledge that there are people who were trying to be just and people who are trying to be not just, in this we already could see that there are significant difference. You might say the evil had been preventing the good from performing, this is also true but we also know that people's heart is not ours to judge and that the Christian's legacy is about judging by results (by the fruit ye shall judge). This entails humbleness, if evil were that simple to address how come our thousands of years of civilization is still haven't done with it? So be disciplined, by the fruit we judge and from there the spirit of sabotage would only go so far (the spirit of evil do evil it couldn't bear good fruit, it needs good fruit to maintain its facade). So again, stay disciplined and judge within our means. 

So at the end of the day its a matter of our articulation of merit within ourselves, and to say socialism would prevail in the end is like saying there wouldn't be people who performed more and there wouldn't be people who performed less. 

This is my thought and I'm not to ignore the scripture, James already talked about taking care of widows and orphans as Just and it is something that we should adhere to (if we could tell apart which widows and orphans are which that would be better, but always be prudent).

--------------------

So hope readers understand what I'm saying here, if the society is not meritocratic (communistic, socialistic) it would make it easier for evil to manifest, but if otherwise, if people were meritocratic, evil would have to maintain good to maintain its human influence.