I was experimenting with voices and noises when the Islamic Prayer chant started, and then I discovered (could be just me though), it has a potent soothing effect for PTSD. I was bamboozled for a sizeable amount of time then
They should've tell people that that's what it do in my opinion if it's true. Albeit that's not the only thing per se, still people should understand what it's also about
The average IQ of the audience or intended readers of Romans are significantly higher than the audience of popular youtube and maybe tiktok (getting the second hand news here) videos.
Thank God for the popularity of the scientific discipline way of thinking, the philosophy behind it and the people who have made it glorified, we have stood on these giant shoulders all this time. Seriously but, things got to improve quick
So you would want to use:
The Law as Casper, Proper History/Image of Our Lord Jesus Christ as Balthazar, and Scientific peer reviewed information as Melchior
The Law means the law as we know it but the part that is made from the Truth and Justice, and it supposed to be updated always in accordance to the reality of things as Truthful as the Truth is.
People would use The Law and Science together, if the combination between Jesus and the Law and Science didn't enhance the combination significantly then you haven't got Jesus properly. If the combination between Jesus and Science was not that essentially good, you haven't got Jesus properly. If the combination between Jesus and the Law was not that revolutionarily fundamental for the future, you haven't got Jesus enough.
If the whole Jesus thing is cap, then don't use it. If you haven't got it then you haven't got it, if you never going to get it because its all a lie then why bother? Personally I believe in it (Jesus) so it is my agenda, but if one would have the perspective where they could make sense of it then suppose he/she would expand on it, I would expect discoveries and revelations.
First of all read Ecclesiastes
1. If you hit a wall and got stuck, just do anything. The water is too murky to see anything right, just do anything / something. The change from what you do will point you towards a new state, or if not do something else.
2. If you hit a wall and everything feels wrong, then it's meaningless. This stage has a bright side as well, just do anything, just not do anything, it's the same. Keep on being in this state and strengthen your mind, keep on at it until you feel indifference towards anything... then... you'll do something, not because it's the right thing to do but it's just the same as not doing anything.
Ultimately if you've read Ecclesiastes and put your faith in it you should be alright, prioritize it, trust it. The power of that book is really different than not reading it.
When exploring properness and morality I realize that to be able to be perfect is really hard, even for things that I've invested in, some of it's potentially harder for me than other people.
Therefore, am I a retard? If I were to compare myself to the people who left Jesus because it was "too hard" it's impulsive to think that I'm "normal". But that's 2000 years ago, and Adam and Eve maybe 10,000 years ago... why is it now it's still hard?
I say if we all could band together and be patient with each other and figure this out, we supposed to innovate in terms of Justice and Truth, to create infrastructures to support properness and morality, goodness, and make it all easier. Honestly this is thousands of years of humanity's issue and most of the answers are already written
Proverbs 15 is hard for me to get a lot out of, I could only pick up bits and pieces of it.
As far as I could go, 15 is about the wisdom of speech and also the wisdom of goodness. If you chose the path of righteousness, everything makes you happy and you'll feast even in the evil of the world because knowledge is food too (referring to the Gospel). I noticed that the "merry" heart in 15:13 is different than the "merry" heart in 15:15 probably a translation mistake. If that's the case then such is my take, bad heart could be "merry" as well.
So when a person is depleted of wisdom, criticizing him/her would bring only fights. For me debating is pleasant and nourishing therefore it is not "fights", but that's just me. Okhay so, there's a spectrum here, a person is not completely foolish not completely wise. If you see the light in their eyes you'd know that they're nourished by it. So we want criticism to rise to a higher plane, why would you stirred up strife when you could cater to the light of the eyes.
But again as a wise person you should be able to control yourself too, if there were "fights" the one talking sh*t is probably to blame even when he means "well" but doesn't change the fact that if we attacked sound knowledge we were the fools and we were not being wise.
In the end of this post I repeat that I could only take so few out of this chapter, it's hard for me to make up better meanings out of them wisdom
I think we should move more and more towards preferential shares from our current credit ways. The important part of it is Proverbs 3:27, when you could pay you should pay especially when the loaner asked you for it.
