Why Property is important for Christians

 Jesus talked about property positively. There were 2 occassions that are popular:

1. The Parable about 5 wise brides and 5 not so wise brides

2. The Parable about an owner and employer giving different rewards to different workers disproportionate in terms of a contribution scale. 

So obviously the idea of property that is prescribed by Jesus Christ is indeed the kind of property that's villanized by communism. Why is this the case?

We need property to focus on serving and not on other things. It's not like that it's fine to sin when you don't have property, it's just that property works and that's the Truth. 

Isn't it evil not to share? Isn't it evil to give different salaries for the same amount of work and even inversely to the amounts of work? No it's not. When you have something it's evil for those who are not you to deprived you off of its ownership. Isn't it good to be able to give what you have to whosoever you desire? Isn't it good to be able to refuse?

There is the proof that Jesus is all about the Truth and not political correctness

Today's Thoughts after thinking about the bible v.06

 I searched who's the greatest in the kingdom of God and found these two answers:

- Little Kids

- Servants

I also read proverbs and I'm fixated on the contrast between the proud and the widow Proverb 15:25

What is the "Proud" mentioned here and in Psalms that it is so bad? 

-----

I like to call on people who don't want to take the due responsibilities but felt entitled to all the benefits "Little Kids", but this is where I'm wrong. Little Kids embrace responsibilities, they want to be bigger and stronger and more capable and explore more (they have the desire to do it right). While the people who have ceased from holding on to the principals of accountability are the opposite of those. 

So the more one wants to contribute, the more of the person was like a little kid. The more a person is young, the more he/she would want to make better and better results. 

So the opposite of this must be the "proud" that's meant by the Proverbs and Psalms based on the contrast on the widow and the other contrasts mentioned there (in Proverbs and Psalms). The "proud" would be the opposite of humbleness where the proud would consider himself/herself no longer necessary to be a further productive positive member of the Kingdom. 

-----

Edit:

We are called to leave our childishness behind and to be an adult. For me now I interpret this as being wiser in taking responsibilities, as much as I want to work and yield results, I also want to do it responsibly. What is responsible productivity? The kind of productivity that is productive and when it was not, we are there to make it right. 

As adults who want to be like Little Kids, we are to be careful not to take on ventures that would hurt our wannability to serve. We are to be careful to accurately pick ventures that would improve our wannability to serve. Making a lot of solutions could hurt our servanthood when they were bad, but making solutions is the way of life. So we got to make it good.

Evangelism argument

My opinion is not yours, so do the opinions of 1000 other people, or a 1.000.000 others

So there's no hope? There is, The Spirit of Truth is God

Proverbs 10 : 19

 In the multitude of words there wanteth not sin: but he that refraineth his lips is wise.

Proverbs 22:16 v.03c

"He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches, and he that giveth to the rich, shall surely come to want"

I looked up in blueletterbible.org H5414 which is the word "giveth" and also the Hebrew text from M.L Kohen's channel on youtube, here's the word per word translation I copied:

one-oppressing poor-one to-increase to-him

one-giving to-rich-one only to-poverty

עֹשֵֽׁק דָּל לְהַרְבּוֹת לוֹ נֹתֵן לְעָשִׁיר אַךְ־ 

לְמַחְסֽוֹר

I'm not an expert and I don't even speak hebrew. So to the extent of my limitation, wouldn't it make more sense if we put the translation like this?

"He that oppresseth the poor to increase the riches that's to be passed over to the rich, shall surely come to want"

Cause why is it bad to give to the rich? What's the context? Solomon was rich, surely he got it given from other people. He's not a gold miner, he's not a farmer, he's not a builder, etc

-----------------

Edit: "He that oppresseth the poor to accumulate for the rich, shall surely come to want", what do you think?

The Shun and my speculation regarding it

When Adam and Eve fell from grace, God shunned them away from the garden leaving them in the world of hard difficulties. 

I believe this event happened for this reason (among others):

Violation of order would invoke liabilities to exploits, if you kept on living in a "Garden" while the system was vulnerable, everything done was subject to sabotage. 

So rather than having expensive ventures being sabotaged in the end, we must diversify and always take into account exploit vulnerabilities in everything we do. Like when installing an operating system you should always have an antivirus/security management system with you. 

Ok so this is my speculation,

The order to multiply and subdue the earth (Genesis 1) was it before or after the fall? It could be after Adam and Eve were shunned, cause the reason why human beings should be so many is to brought into reality a comprehensive security system or systems that's good enough to mitigate all of the evil from the "enemy". Good enough "anti-injustice" systems

-------------------

Proverbs 4:23

Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.

The Spirit of Truth is not dismissable v.02

 And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men;

That's Colossian 3:23

So at first it seems that people who do their job with lies get different results than those who do it Truthfully, a lot more money potentially.

For us Christians we must keep our Faith including our logic that the way things develop, things that were done in despise of the Truth would brought about irrelevance (in terms of the Truth).