To test one's Godliness

Not to be confused with to test God:

To test one's Godliness,

Taking the name of Love for mere political position? That wouldn't be Lovely, that couldn't be God. God is to be prioritized... well "God". 

So there should be a distinction between this figure in the sky who is not an absolute being and God himself. For we could ascertain what is Godly or not, God is the Spirit of Truth, God is Love. 

Attributing a persona to the Spirit of Truth, which is not the Spirit of Truth would be falsehood. So is to Love. If the so called "God" was not doing things that are Truthfully Lovely, why is it a sin to question his/His Godliness?

What the story about Eve told me v.03

So when Eve were faced with the case of to eat or not to eat, what is the wise option here?

She knew that she's not as wise as God, not as smart as God, while the very same God who is greater than her told her not to eat the fruit... would taking the chance of being as smart as God justify the mistake or the violation?

I couldn't say that such potential wouldn't exist, but it was risky. So the better way of dealing with it, is to wait for God himself and inquire with Him. 

We tend to imagine figure of power as such that couldn't be approached and that we shouldn't waste his/her time. This is God, so if there were new points of concerns, such as "Is it true that eating this would make me as smart as You? If so why wouldn't you wanted me to be so?" He would be the One to answer it. 

Then again probably there were nuances that were not told in this story, it could be that God's reputation has been tainted, there were dissatisfactions instilled beforehand, there were suspicions about Him beforehand. 

To answer this supposed case is to look at what God has provided statistically. For one who creates good results must have good in him/her. Yet, should Eve had perceived such thing? Had it been "common sense" ten thousand years ago? Maybe not, but do I know better? now it is I that's presented with the same case... 

Would you challenge a greater wisdom knowing that there was one? How would you go about it? The bible told us that violation should not be our first resort.

What Satan implied here is that he could be the one to go to, if we were to scrutinize God. The problem is, Satan wouldn't meet God face to face. Is he equal to God? Is he not? he provided not accountability. Surely, if his well-being was also at risk if God was the kind of boss that we thought might be implied here... not changing the fact that Satan provided no accountability. 

Again is this implication correct? or are we still being lied to all the way until now? 

Who is God, how could a person possibly inquire? These imaginary Satan vs God thing are imaginary... one might say

God is the Spirit of Truth, also God is Love ("In the end, the reality is heading towards improvements")

Optimizing Proverbs v.03

People might be discouraged in reading Proverbs because it seemed to be too judgemental, encourages people to point fingers and feel all high and mighty and wise. 

So that is not how you use it, the way is there in the Proverb itself: Those that considered themselves wise, there's more hope for a fool than for him (I'm paraphrasing a bit). The way you get more out of Proverb is to find the fool, the wicked, the evil in you. 

If you read Proverb and feel like you're wise, you should keep reading until you feel personally attacked. If you got it then you got the room for improvement. (Edit: Rephrasing that: you should keep reading and thinking until you figured out how you're vulnerable).

Proverb is very good for increasing your growth, when you feel good about yourself and you feel like it's time to improve, then Proverb is where you could find good things that would make you feel bad. And it's free!

Questioning hopelessness in Hebrews 6 : 6 (v. 02b)

Hebrews 6 : 6 talks about someone who has experienced the intense goodness of salvation and then falls out of grace again, being definitely doomed. 

So there are some people who are just not meant for Christianity ever. 

Hebrew then would continue on saying something I found to be questionable, but before that I'm going to address this first, if that were the case, that some people are just not meant for Christianity, than I don't think it is as bad as it sounds. For one the Christians wouldn't like it if they were to be counted as one of the Christians when they were not, and then they wouldn't like it themselves because they themselves rejected the Christian life. So it is actually a win win. 

Looking deeper at what the writer was saying, one prove that you're not one of those people is : you contributed to the cause. Yes, to keep it simple stupid or stupid simple, you give goods and services or money to the cause then you're not one of those people (a lot of people wouldn't agree with me or like the way I say it). Now, is this one of those things that pastors said to scare their congregations into donating money? I don't know, but I find it reasonable to put it like that. Why is it that in businessess it is ok to not deal with people who wouldn't appreciate you with money while in the church not? Money is an acknowledgement anyway, if you really appreciates Christianity then money is a clear proof that you do, although it shouldn't be the only thing that defines your Christianity. So the act of contributing, is one of the indication that you are not crucifying Jesus the second time.

Now why is that the case? I think it comes down to the meaning of the crucifixion, it is that the crucified is worthless, to be disposed of, to be disregarded, discarded. Why would a person contributes to something he/she couldn't appreciate? Here we see the meaning of fruit in Christianity, because the book of Hebrew illustrates these people as a field that received rain but grew thorns and thistle instead of crops, they produced the insult after being fed with the grace of God. Fruit is positive contribution for the kingdom of God. 

Again and again the bible talks about discernment through results rather than facade. My question is, what if these people one day changed their mind and started contributing to the cause of God then? Healing people, enriching people positively, consoling people. By then I wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Should it be considered that they weren't adults (as in Hebrew 6) when they dismissed Christianity? Or should Christianity be defined differently, those that do the work of the kingdom are Christians (Godlike) whether or not they were church people? In turn it means that church people who weren't doing the work of the kingdom were not really Godlike. I like the way it sounds but I think there must be more to it, much more to it.

The problem with Christians

Actually it's just "One of the problem" with Christians, but that sounded kinda meh. 

So the problem with Christians is, the infallibility. We always took the stance of infallibility of our ideology, so that means we won't evolve. That's a problem and these past 2000 years has proven that we couldn't but to evolve, we are forced to evolve. 

Why can't Christianity be considered ok like other ideology like buddhism, or even satanism? Because we won't change, we won't correct ourselves and that's scary. When we are passive, things might be relatively peaceful with us, but when we exercise power based on Christianity... it's infallible. That's stupid, we are not Jesus, we are not God. 

So in my opinion if we wanted to be ourselves and be harmonious with other people, our reputation to be less notorious, we should stop prioritizing the words of the bible that we thought are always right, over evidence and logic. To add to this, the fact that we are not ready with our logical defense and resorted to "the bible is always right" kind of attitude, could reliably interpreted that deep down, we actually are afraid of the Truth, we are not on the side of the Truth, we are not with the Truth. 

So stupid, the Spirit of Truth is our God. 

Let's prioritize Him over our narratives.

The Contrast to be Concluded Eternally v.05

God is the creator, who brought order out of chaos. Lovely order

God is The Word, who salvaged the letters into eternal meaning, Love

God is The Spirith of Truth, who solidifies all of the above so that the results are permanent / stable as one reality. 

Everything that Jesus said about the enemy therefore can be seen as the opposite of God, a thief (who stole people out of Love), a destroyer (who disrupts the order of Love), the father of lies (who made people believe in lies about what is Lovely and what's not, what is eternally good, what is True, what is wise, and what is not). 

The Meaning of my baptism v.03

I acknowledge the Life that created the world (The Father), and that as a living being, the purpose is Salvation (The Son), and that it is going to happen (to be True, The Spirit of Truth, The Holy Spirit). 

That I left my old self in the water (Chaos), moving forward in the direction (putting myself in order). 

Even if I fell while carrying my cross, this baptism is in the memory of the Truth and I could always get back to it, no one could take it away from me (one baptism). 

The fire of the Truth, the trials of reality is going to leave me as gold or everything that's precious (by Fire)

And we'll emerge victorious (The Kingdom of Jesus, the sick healed, the weak strengthened, the needy helped, the grieving consoled, the blind sees, the deaf hears...)